Moderators: Steve, SuperKyle, chacal007, Doc Holiday, Gumzilla, BoBoi
Jedi Tucker wrote:I'd use the force on her![]()
on her.
Xray wrote:She's "your sister's friend" cute. Or "she sits in front of you in class" cute. That's all.

Jedi Tucker wrote:Xray wrote:She's "your sister's friend" cute. Or "she sits in front of you in class" cute. That's all.
I married my sister's friend so what's your point exactly?


Xray wrote:Jedi Tucker wrote:Xray wrote:She's "your sister's friend" cute. Or "she sits in front of you in class" cute. That's all.
I married my sister's friend so what's your point exactly?
My point is that she resides merely in the "cute" category, not the "hot" and "sexy" and "extremely beautiful" categories. If you like that and are ok with that, then good for you.

I agree, but I'm not talking about partnerng up, I'm talking about Natalie pictures. And I don't usually like those cookie-cutter "beauties" like the cheerleader/supermodel type. Doesn't usually do it for me. I usually like the cute girls. To me, Natalie is just ok.Jedi Tucker wrote:Xray wrote:Jedi Tucker wrote:Xray wrote:She's "your sister's friend" cute. Or "she sits in front of you in class" cute. That's all.
I married my sister's friend so what's your point exactly?
My point is that she resides merely in the "cute" category, not the "hot" and "sexy" and "extremely beautiful" categories. If you like that and are ok with that, then good for you.
The one's that reside in the 'cute' category are usually the ones that make the best partners. I rest my case for the defence of the cute girls.


Xray wrote:I agree, but I'm not talking about partnerng up, I'm talking about Natalie pictures. And I don't usually like those cookie-cutter "beauties" like the cheerleader/supermodel type. Doesn't usually do it for me. I usually like the cute girls. To me, Natalie is just ok.Jedi Tucker wrote:Xray wrote:Jedi Tucker wrote:Xray wrote:She's "your sister's friend" cute. Or "she sits in front of you in class" cute. That's all.
I married my sister's friend so what's your point exactly?
My point is that she resides merely in the "cute" category, not the "hot" and "sexy" and "extremely beautiful" categories. If you like that and are ok with that, then good for you.
The one's that reside in the 'cute' category are usually the ones that make the best partners. I rest my case for the defence of the cute girls.
Others like Natalie. To each their own, I guess.


Belfast Cowboy wrote:
I find excellent points in both your arguments; I despise Natalie on "moral" grounds.

Jedi Tucker wrote:Belfast Cowboy wrote:
I find excellent points in both your arguments; I despise Natalie on "moral" grounds.
However, on 'boinkable' grounds, you'd slam her like a screen door in a tornado

XperiMental wrote:Jedi Tucker wrote:Belfast Cowboy wrote:
I find excellent points in both your arguments; I despise Natalie on "moral" grounds.
However, on 'boinkable' grounds, you'd slam her like a screen door in a tornado
"Boinkable" - is that a scienfic term for female categorization ?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest